Welcome to the Cadillac V-Series Forums!

Media dumps

It's electric...just kidding (winking eye).
Ok, that's what I thought, but the Mustang Mach-E is apparently going to be offering some type of gear change mechanism. Just announced it.
 
I think the Ioniq 5 N also has a simulated shift feature too. So who knows. I was really just yanking everyone's chain, but even if they do go with simulated shifting it's likely an auto paddle shift instead of a clutch. By the way, without looking too deeply into it the Ioniq 5 N might be similar size and performance the Optiq-V might have. Even the names are similar.
 

The times may be a-changin', but over a few days and several hundred miles, the Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing showed that a classic can still jam. Sure, this car makes some sacrifices to keep its base price low, and ticking options boxes will destroy the value proposition, but the Caddy's driving dynamics and overall packaging earned Detroit the win. Tail-happy rear-drive antics pair perfectly with the Blackwing's huffing and puffing V-8.
 
CT 5 V BW for the win...No surprise really....I mean really...
 
Savagegeese video incoming. If you've seen the others they've done, you know a refresh and Precision Pkg is more than enough for Jack to justify another go.
Screenshot_20250425_214209_Instagram.jpg
 
Wow their fix is just heavier oil?
Probably enough for the engines that aren't too far gone to last beyond the powertrain warranty so when it does go boom it's on the customer.
 
I enjoyed this comparison - straight up and to the point...but perhaps could have included some more specific performance driving analysis. In theory these are performance sedans for the enthusiast and not just luxury cars (but also not just track or pure sports cars)...so mostly his perspectives are valid. In the end he made the right conclusion - Caddy for the driving enthusiast. Each car certainly has its merits and none are "bad" cars. There are valid reasons for choosing and preferring each,

Still....once again the CT 4 V BW shines where those of us who already get it really understand and appreciate, Its just a drivers car that does it (very) well. And as nice as the interiors and amenities of Lexus, BMW, Audi etc are, and the panache of the name plates...its clear what the enthusiast drivers choice should be.

And I'll say it again - the CT 4 Vs turbo V6 is a real joy even if perhaps not technically the "best" engine - I think its right for the car and performs very well with a naturally aspirated and free revving feeling. I also think the Caddy;s interior and features are spot on - purposeful, easy to use, highly functional and just great IMO. I'm not wanting different or more.

OK Exhaust sounds....we might want more....but it sounds good and there are now some options to enhance. The car is an absolute joy to drive and to be in. I can't fault folks who might choose the lexus or M3 or such for whatever reason but I think I clearly made the right choice for me (great MT alone is a reason) and I think many who choose to pass on or are unaware of what this car has to offer are seriously missing out.

Too bad the Alpha Guilia QF never came in MT....now that would be a serious enthusiast driving competitor. Even if I still would not be displeased with the Caddy or regret my choice.
 
I enjoyed this comparison - straight up and to the point...but perhaps could have included some more specific performance driving analysis. In theory these are performance sedans for the enthusiast and not just luxury cars (but also not just track or pure sports cars)...so mostly his perspectives are valid. In the end he made the right conclusion - Caddy for the driving enthusiast. Each car certainly has its merits and none are "bad" cars. There are valid reasons for choosing and preferring each,

Still....once again the CT 4 V BW shines where those of us who already get it really understand and appreciate, Its just a drivers car that does it (very) well. And as nice as the interiors and amenities of Lexus, BMW, Audi etc are, and the panache of the name plates...its clear what the enthusiast drivers choice should be.

And I'll say it again - the CT 4 Vs turbo V6 is a real joy even if perhaps not technically the "best" engine - I think its right for the car and performs very well with a naturally aspirated and free revving feeling. I also think the Caddy;s interior and features are spot on - purposeful, easy to use, highly functional and just great IMO. I'm not wanting different or more.

OK Exhaust sounds....we might want more....but it sounds good and there are now some options to enhance. The car is an absolute joy to drive and to be in. I can't fault folks who might choose the lexus or M3 or such for whatever reason but I think I clearly made the right choice for me (great MT alone is a reason) and I think many who choose to pass on or are unaware of what this car has to offer are seriously missing out.

Too bad the Alpha Guilia QF never came in MT....now that would be a serious enthusiast driving competitor. Even if I still would not be displeased with the Caddy or regret my choice.
If the Quad were offered in a manual stateside I would also be in one. It’s such a beautiful car inside and out. I fell in love with it at the auto show. They did make it in a manual overseas. The Blackwing is great though and probably less of a headache… I have done a lot of research on the QF and it has reliability issues and a sparse dealer/service network.
 

Win 2 Supercharged Cadillacs!

Win both supercharged Cadillac Vs!

Supporting Vendors

Exhibitions of Speed

Signature Wheels

V-Series Marketplace

Advertise with the Cadillac V-Net!

Torque Shop

Our Partners

Back
Top Bottom