Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was told in no uncertain terms not to NLS by a SM instructor, after he heard it on the launch control runs. He claimed a few cars had new motors, blown up from NLSing for extended periods of time on track. The reasoning was higher EGTs due to spark retard and fuel cut during NLS caused exhaust valves to overheat.What did they say about NLS? Or A10 vs 6M on the track? If your gonna talk on their behalf, then talk on their behalf. What you are saying goes against all engineering GM completed in development.
Talking about the car itself and its engineering CF1 vs none, the rest is driver input...
I think we've also got @Megamike55 and @Mike Martz, unless their plans have changed.Getting ready for my trip out next week. Anyone else besides @Matt27 and I going May 19th and 20th?
I was told in no uncertain terms not to NLS by a SM instructor, after he heard it on the launch control runs. He claimed a few cars had new motors, blown up from NLSing for extended periods of time on track. The reasoning was higher EGTs due to spark retard and fuel cut during NLS caused exhaust valves to overheat.
Same here, I was told not to do it anymore either, after doing it for the 3rd to 4th shift on the main straight. They explained that NLS is great but it's hard on the car.
Once again, my warning is to not listen to the SM instructors when it comes specifically to the engineering and technical aspects of the cars. They don't know what they're talking about. Very clearly. NLS is fine for the engine; GM's lawyers wouldn't have let them put it into the car otherwise. And it's also been available since the second gen CTS-V.
I will agree that doing it on a road course, specially if you don't know what you're doing, is detrimental to your lap time. Most people who attempt to NLS, even if they complete it successfully, upset the car a bit. That "bit" is enough to disrupt the smoothness of the car, which will, as you've hopefully learned, harm your lap time. Purposeful, quick, but smooth shifts are the way to go on the road course. Leave the NLS for the drag strip.
when i went they said you can do it if you want and they didn't care. in the garage segment they also said things that were blatantly not true, like not having to change transmission fluid. the factory manual clearly lays out how often to change it and the rear diff if tracking. their claim was that they don't keep the cars long enough to need to. i got in a car that had over 20k on the clock, which given that nearly all of that was track time would be well in excess of what is outlined in the manual. the instructors may know how to drive very well, especially the SM tracks they are on every day. i wouldn't put a lot of stock in what they say in regards to engineering. when someone in class asked about NLS they didn't even know the conditions required to make it happen.I was told in no uncertain terms not to NLS by a SM instructor, after he heard it on the launch control runs. He claimed a few cars had new motors, blown up from NLSing for extended periods of time on track. The reasoning was higher EGTs due to spark retard and fuel cut during NLS caused exhaust valves to overheat.
I did the wet figure 8s in a CT5 ...
They use two cars for that exercise and on my turn the 5 happen to be the open seat in my group so.How did this come to be? Did you swap cars with someone?
Why do they only use two cars ? When I went last December, you used the same assigned car for every event , for both days. I do know that the cars got a bit muddy looking after the wet course. Maybe they just don't like washing all the cars.
They said because of them getting dirty/muddy and the tire wear.Why do they only use two cars ? When I went last December, you used the same assigned car for every event , for both days. I do know that the cars got a bit muddy looking after the wet course. Maybe they just don't like washing all the cars.
Interesting you should mention, I also drove #41 when I was there in February, and it had some pretty bad shaking under hard braking on day 1. I told my instructor about it, and he drove it at the end of the day, confirmed the issue, and had them replace the brakes (pads and rotors) overnight. The problem was gone on day 2.That's the one area the number 41 disappointed me, it had a lot of judder in under hard braking.